diff options
author | Anoop Jacob Thomas | 2010-10-09 03:56:06 +0530 |
---|---|---|
committer | Anoop Jacob Thomas | 2010-10-09 03:56:06 +0530 |
commit | 0894afa11beac170154edff37bef6e810fe2d9f3 (patch) | |
tree | cad7e26371f79afa7edf8988beeaf547e99083bc /getting-started-with-for/script.rst | |
parent | eafe64ed9f533aca8309e1b40f1b95455735b23a (diff) | |
download | st-scripts-0894afa11beac170154edff37bef6e810fe2d9f3.tar.gz st-scripts-0894afa11beac170154edff37bef6e810fe2d9f3.tar.bz2 st-scripts-0894afa11beac170154edff37bef6e810fe2d9f3.zip |
added base scripts and questions except for matrices and other-type-of-plots. previous commit only removed unwanted files.
Diffstat (limited to 'getting-started-with-for/script.rst')
-rw-r--r-- | getting-started-with-for/script.rst | 273 |
1 files changed, 273 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/getting-started-with-for/script.rst b/getting-started-with-for/script.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ce6e26c --- /dev/null +++ b/getting-started-with-for/script.rst @@ -0,0 +1,273 @@ +.. 3.2 LO: getting started with =for= (2) [anoop] +.. ----------------------------------------------- +.. * blocks in python +.. + (indentation) +.. * blocks in ipython +.. + ... prompt +.. + hitting enter +.. * =for= with a list +.. * =range= function + +============================= +Getting started with for loop +============================= + +{{{ show welcome slide }}} + +Hello and welcome to the tutorial getting started with ``for`` loop. + +{{{ switch to next slide, outline slide }}} + +In this tutorial we will learn about ``for`` loops in python, and also +learn how to write blocks of code in Python. + +.. #[Nishanth]: Instead of saying basics of indenting code, + say How to define code blocks in Python + +{{{ switch to next slide, about whitespaces }}} + +In Python whitespace is significant, and the blocks are visually +separated. + +.. #[nishanth]: Simply tell how blocks are defined in python. + The details like braces are not used and its + advantages like neat code can be told after completely + explaining the indentation + +.. #[Amit]: Do you want to do that here. May be its better to talk about + this after some initiation into the idea of blocks. + +The best practice is to indent the code using four spaces. + +.. #[Nishanth]: Even this detail may be skipped. Simply say use 4 spaces + for indentation. Do that while typing so that they can + actually see what is being typed. + +Now let us move straight into ``for`` loop. + +{{{ switch to next slide, problem statement of exercise 1 }}} + + +Write a for loop which iterates through a list of numbers and find the +square root of each number. +:: + + numbers are 1369, 7225, 3364, 7056, 5625, 729, 7056, 576, 2916 + +.. #[nishanth]: making new list with square roots induces extra complication + like appending which has no use case here + +.. #[Nishanth]: The problem focuses more on square root and creation + of list. The problem must be simple and focusing on + nothing more but the indentation and for loop. + May be change the problem to print squares than to + print square roots. + +For the problem, first we need to create a ``list`` of numbers and +then iterate over the list and find the square root of each element in +it. And let us create a script, rather than typing it out in the +interpreter itself. Create a script called list_roots.py and type the +following. + +{{{ open the text editor and paste the following code there }}} +:: + + numbers = [1369, 7225, 3364, 7056, 5625, 729, 7056, 576, 2916] + for each in numbers: + print "Square root of", each, "is", sqrt(each) + print "This is not in for loop!" + +.. numbers = [1, 12, 3, 4, 21, 17] + for each in numbers: + print each, each * each + +.. #[nishanth]: I don't see a use case to append the sq_root to + square_roots. It is only complicating stuff. + Simply iterate and print. + +{{{ save the script }}} + +Now save the script, and run it from your IPython interpreter. I +assume that you have started your IPython interpreter using ``-pylab`` +option. + +Run the script as, +:: + + %run -i list_roots.py + +.. #[Nishanth]: you don't have to use the -i option here + +{{{ run the script }}} + +So that was easy! All what we did was iterate over the list element by +element and then use the element for calculation. Note that here we +used two variables. One the variable ``numbers``, which is a list, +another one ``each``, which is the element of list under consideration +in each cycle of the ``for`` loop. The variable names can be chosen by +you. + +.. #[Nishanth]: The details like we didn't have to find the length + are relevant for people who have programmed in C or + other languages earlier. But for a newbie it is more + of confusing extra info. That part may be skipped. + Simply go ahead and focus on the syntax of for loop. + And how the variable name is used inside the for loop. + If you modify the question to only print, the extra + variable sq_root can also be avoided. let it be more + about "each", "numbers" and "for". no other new names. + +{{{ show the script which was created }}} + +Note that the lines after ``for`` statement, is indented using four +spaces. + +{{{ highlight the line after for statement }}} + +It means that line is part of the for loop. And it is a block of code, +although it is only a single statement in the block. And the fourth +line or the immediate line after the ``for`` block is not indented, + +{{{ highlight the fourth line - the line just after for loop }}} + +it means that it is not part of the ``for`` loop and the lines after +that doesn't fall in the scope of the ``for`` loop. Thus each block is +separated by the indentation level. Thus marking the importance of +white-spaces in Python. + +{{{ switch to the slide which shows the problem statement of the first +problem to be tried out }}} + +Now a question for you to try, from the given numbers make a list of +perfect squares and a list of those which are not. The numbers are, +:: + + 7225, 3268, 3364, 2966, 7056, 5625, 729, 5547, 7056, 576, 2916 + +{{{ switch to next slide, problem statement of second problem in +solved exercise}}} + +Now let us try a simple one, to print the square root of numbers in +the list. And this time let us do it right in the IPython +interpreter. + +{{{ switch focus to the IPython interpreter }}} + +So let us start with making a list. Type the following +:: + + numbers = [1369, 7225, 3364, 7056, 5625, 729, 7056, 576, 2916] + for each in numbers: + +and now you will notice that, as soon as you press the return key +after for statement, the prompt changes to four dots and the cursor is +not right after the four dots but there are four spaces from the +dots. Please note that IPython automatically indents the block. The +four dots tell you that you are inside a block. Now type the rest of +the ``for`` loop, + +.. #[Nishanth]: Tell that IPython does auto indentation. + +:: + + print "Square root of", each, "is", sqrt(each) + +Now we have finished the statements in the block, and still the +interpreter is showing four dots, which means you are still inside the +block. To exit from the block press return key or the enter key twice +without entering anything else. It printed the square root of each +number in the list, and that is executed in a ``for`` loop. + +Now, let us find the cube of all the numbers from one to ten. But this +time let us try it in the vanilla version of Python interpreter. + +Start the vanilla version of Python interpreter by issuing the command +``python`` in your terminal. + +{{{ open the python interpreter in the terminal using the command +python to start the vanilla Python interpreter }}} + +Start with, +:: + + for i in range(1,11): + +and press enter once, and we will see that this time it shows four +dots, but the cursor is close to the dots, so we have to indent the +block. The vanilla version of Python interpreter does not indent the +code automatically. So enter four spaces there and then type the +following +:: + + print i, "cube is", i**3 + +Now when we hit enter, we still see the four dots, to get out of the +block, hit enter once again + +.. #[Nishanth]: Here also the overhead on print can be reduced. + Think of a simple print statement. This statement + will be confusing for a newbie. + We can focus more on indentation in python. + +.. #[nishanth]: Not sure if you must use range here. You can + define a list of numbers and iterate on it. + Then say this list can also be generated using + the range function and hence introduce range. + +Okay! so the main thing here we learned is how to use Python +interpreter and IPython interpreter to specify blocks. But while we +were generating the multiplication table we used something new, +``range()`` function. ``range()`` is an inbuilt function in Python +which can be used to generate a ``list`` of integers from a starting +number to an ending number. Note that the ending number that you +specify will not be included in the ``list``. + +.. #[Nishanth]: Show some examples of range without the step argument + May be give an exercise with negative numbers as arguments + +Now, let us print all the odd numbers from 1 to 50. Let us do it in +our IPython interpreter for ease of use. + +{{{ switch to next slide, problem statement of the next problem in +solved exercises }}} + +{{{ switch focus to ipython interpreter }}} + +The problem can be solved by just using the ``range()`` function. + +It can be solved as, +:: + + print range(1,51,2) + +This time we passed three parameters to ``range()`` function unlike +the previous case where we passed only two parameters. The first two +parameters are the same in both the cases. The first parameter is the +starting number of the sequence and the second parameter is the end of +the range. Note that the sequence doesn't include the ending +number. The third parameter is for stepping through the sequence. Here +we gave two which means we are skipping every alternate element. + +{{{ switch to next slide, recap slide }}} + +Thus we come to the end of this tutorial. We learned about blocks in +Python, indentation, blocks in IPython, for loop, iterating over a +list and then the ``range()`` function. + +.. #[Amit]: There does seem to too much overhead of details. Should + the first example be done using script is it necessary. + Do add some things in evolutionary manner. Like introducing + range as a list and doing a very very simple for loop.Like + iterating over [1,2,3] .Before getting into a problem. + And club details about problem in one paragraph and syntactic details + in other. + +{{{ switch to next slide, thank you slide }}} + +Thank you! + +.. Author: Anoop Jacob Thomas <anoop@fossee.in> + Reviewer 1: Nishanth + Reviewer 2: Amit Sethi + External reviewer: + |