summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/parts/django/tests/regressiontests/one_to_one_regress/tests.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'parts/django/tests/regressiontests/one_to_one_regress/tests.py')
-rw-r--r--parts/django/tests/regressiontests/one_to_one_regress/tests.py130
1 files changed, 130 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/parts/django/tests/regressiontests/one_to_one_regress/tests.py b/parts/django/tests/regressiontests/one_to_one_regress/tests.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8787575
--- /dev/null
+++ b/parts/django/tests/regressiontests/one_to_one_regress/tests.py
@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+from django.test import TestCase
+from regressiontests.one_to_one_regress.models import *
+
+class OneToOneRegressionTests(TestCase):
+
+ def setUp(self):
+ self.p1 = Place(name='Demon Dogs', address='944 W. Fullerton')
+ self.p1.save()
+ self.r1 = Restaurant(place=self.p1, serves_hot_dogs=True, serves_pizza=False)
+ self.r1.save()
+ self.b1 = Bar(place=self.p1, serves_cocktails=False)
+ self.b1.save()
+
+ def test_reverse_relationship_cache_cascade(self):
+ """
+ Regression test for #9023: accessing the reverse relationship shouldn't
+ result in a cascading delete().
+ """
+ bar = UndergroundBar.objects.create(place=self.p1, serves_cocktails=False)
+
+ # The bug in #9023: if you access the one-to-one relation *before*
+ # setting to None and deleting, the cascade happens anyway.
+ self.p1.undergroundbar
+ bar.place.name='foo'
+ bar.place = None
+ bar.save()
+ self.p1.delete()
+
+ self.assertEqual(Place.objects.all().count(), 0)
+ self.assertEqual(UndergroundBar.objects.all().count(), 1)
+
+ def test_create_models_m2m(self):
+ """
+ Regression test for #1064 and #1506
+
+ Check that we create models via the m2m relation if the remote model
+ has a OneToOneField.
+ """
+ f = Favorites(name = 'Fred')
+ f.save()
+ f.restaurants = [self.r1]
+ self.assertQuerysetEqual(
+ f.restaurants.all(),
+ ['<Restaurant: Demon Dogs the restaurant>']
+ )
+
+ def test_reverse_object_cache(self):
+ """
+ Regression test for #7173
+
+ Check that the name of the cache for the reverse object is correct.
+ """
+ self.assertEquals(self.p1.restaurant, self.r1)
+ self.assertEquals(self.p1.bar, self.b1)
+
+ def test_related_object_cache(self):
+ """ Regression test for #6886 (the related-object cache) """
+
+ # Look up the objects again so that we get "fresh" objects
+ p = Place.objects.get(name="Demon Dogs")
+ r = p.restaurant
+
+ # Accessing the related object again returns the exactly same object
+ self.assertTrue(p.restaurant is r)
+
+ # But if we kill the cache, we get a new object
+ del p._restaurant_cache
+ self.assertFalse(p.restaurant is r)
+
+ # Reassigning the Restaurant object results in an immediate cache update
+ # We can't use a new Restaurant because that'll violate one-to-one, but
+ # with a new *instance* the is test below will fail if #6886 regresses.
+ r2 = Restaurant.objects.get(pk=r.pk)
+ p.restaurant = r2
+ self.assertTrue(p.restaurant is r2)
+
+ # Assigning None succeeds if field is null=True.
+ ug_bar = UndergroundBar.objects.create(place=p, serves_cocktails=False)
+ ug_bar.place = None
+ self.assertTrue(ug_bar.place is None)
+
+ # Assigning None fails: Place.restaurant is null=False
+ self.assertRaises(ValueError, setattr, p, 'restaurant', None)
+
+ # You also can't assign an object of the wrong type here
+ self.assertRaises(ValueError, setattr, p, 'restaurant', p)
+
+ # Creation using keyword argument should cache the related object.
+ p = Place.objects.get(name="Demon Dogs")
+ r = Restaurant(place=p)
+ self.assertTrue(r.place is p)
+
+ # Creation using keyword argument and unsaved related instance (#8070).
+ p = Place()
+ r = Restaurant(place=p)
+ self.assertTrue(r.place is p)
+
+ # Creation using attname keyword argument and an id will cause the related
+ # object to be fetched.
+ p = Place.objects.get(name="Demon Dogs")
+ r = Restaurant(place_id=p.id)
+ self.assertFalse(r.place is p)
+ self.assertEqual(r.place, p)
+
+ def test_filter_one_to_one_relations(self):
+ """
+ Regression test for #9968
+
+ filtering reverse one-to-one relations with primary_key=True was
+ misbehaving. We test both (primary_key=True & False) cases here to
+ prevent any reappearance of the problem.
+ """
+ t = Target.objects.create()
+
+ self.assertQuerysetEqual(
+ Target.objects.filter(pointer=None),
+ ['<Target: Target object>']
+ )
+ self.assertQuerysetEqual(
+ Target.objects.exclude(pointer=None),
+ []
+ )
+ self.assertQuerysetEqual(
+ Target.objects.filter(pointer2=None),
+ ['<Target: Target object>']
+ )
+ self.assertQuerysetEqual(
+ Target.objects.exclude(pointer2=None),
+ []
+ )