summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/parts/django/docs/ref/contrib/csrf.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'parts/django/docs/ref/contrib/csrf.txt')
-rw-r--r--parts/django/docs/ref/contrib/csrf.txt433
1 files changed, 433 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/parts/django/docs/ref/contrib/csrf.txt b/parts/django/docs/ref/contrib/csrf.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c32dd73
--- /dev/null
+++ b/parts/django/docs/ref/contrib/csrf.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,433 @@
+=====================================
+Cross Site Request Forgery protection
+=====================================
+
+.. module:: django.middleware.csrf
+ :synopsis: Protects against Cross Site Request Forgeries
+
+The CSRF middleware and template tag provides easy-to-use protection against
+`Cross Site Request Forgeries`_. This type of attack occurs when a malicious
+Web site contains a link, a form button or some javascript that is intended to
+perform some action on your Web site, using the credentials of a logged-in user
+who visits the malicious site in their browser. A related type of attack,
+'login CSRF', where an attacking site tricks a user's browser into logging into
+a site with someone else's credentials, is also covered.
+
+The first defense against CSRF attacks is to ensure that GET requests are
+side-effect free. POST requests can then be protected by following the steps
+below.
+
+.. versionadded:: 1.2
+ The 'contrib' apps, including the admin, use the functionality described
+ here. Because it is security related, a few things have been added to core
+ functionality to allow this to happen without any required upgrade steps.
+
+.. _Cross Site Request Forgeries: http://www.squarefree.com/securitytips/web-developers.html#CSRF
+
+How to use it
+=============
+
+.. versionchanged:: 1.2
+ The template tag functionality (the recommended way to use this) was added
+ in version 1.2. The previous method (still available) is described under
+ `Legacy method`_.
+
+To enable CSRF protection for your views, follow these steps:
+
+ 1. Add the middleware
+ ``'django.middleware.csrf.CsrfViewMiddleware'`` to your list of
+ middleware classes, :setting:`MIDDLEWARE_CLASSES`. (It should come
+ before ``CsrfResponseMiddleware`` if that is being used, and before any
+ view middleware that assume that CSRF attacks have been dealt with.)
+
+ Alternatively, you can use the decorator
+ ``django.views.decorators.csrf.csrf_protect`` on particular views you
+ want to protect (see below).
+
+ 2. In any template that uses a POST form, use the :ttag:`csrf_token` tag inside
+ the ``<form>`` element if the form is for an internal URL, e.g.::
+
+ <form action="" method="post">{% csrf_token %}
+
+ This should not be done for POST forms that target external URLs, since
+ that would cause the CSRF token to be leaked, leading to a vulnerability.
+
+ 3. In the corresponding view functions, ensure that the
+ ``'django.core.context_processors.csrf'`` context processor is
+ being used. Usually, this can be done in one of two ways:
+
+ 1. Use RequestContext, which always uses
+ ``'django.core.context_processors.csrf'`` (no matter what your
+ TEMPLATE_CONTEXT_PROCESSORS setting). If you are using
+ generic views or contrib apps, you are covered already, since these
+ apps use RequestContext throughout.
+
+ 2. Manually import and use the processor to generate the CSRF token and
+ add it to the template context. e.g.::
+
+ from django.core.context_processors import csrf
+ from django.shortcuts import render_to_response
+
+ def my_view(request):
+ c = {}
+ c.update(csrf(request))
+ # ... view code here
+ return render_to_response("a_template.html", c)
+
+ You may want to write your own ``render_to_response`` wrapper that
+ takes care of this step for you.
+
+The utility script ``extras/csrf_migration_helper.py`` can help to automate the
+finding of code and templates that may need to be upgraded. It contains full
+help on how to use it.
+
+The decorator method
+--------------------
+
+Rather than adding ``CsrfViewMiddleware`` as a blanket protection, you can use
+the ``csrf_protect`` decorator, which has exactly the same functionality, on
+particular views that need the protection. It must be used **both** on views
+that insert the CSRF token in the output, and on those that accept the POST form
+data. (These are often the same view function, but not always). It is used like
+this::
+
+ from django.views.decorators.csrf import csrf_protect
+ from django.template import RequestContext
+
+ @csrf_protect
+ def my_view(request):
+ c = {}
+ # ...
+ return render_to_response("a_template.html", c,
+ context_instance=RequestContext(request))
+
+Use of the decorator is **not recommended** by itself, since if you forget to
+use it, you will have a security hole. The 'belt and braces' strategy of using
+both is fine, and will incur minimal overhead.
+
+Legacy method
+-------------
+
+In Django 1.1, the template tag did not exist. Instead, a post-processing
+middleware that re-wrote POST forms to include the CSRF token was used. If you
+are upgrading a site from version 1.1 or earlier, please read this section and
+the `Upgrading notes`_ below. The post-processing middleware is still available
+as ``CsrfResponseMiddleware``, and it can be used by following these steps:
+
+ 1. Follow step 1 above to install ``CsrfViewMiddleware``.
+
+ 2. Add ``'django.middleware.csrf.CsrfResponseMiddleware'`` to your
+ :setting:`MIDDLEWARE_CLASSES` setting.
+
+ ``CsrfResponseMiddleware`` needs to process the response before things
+ like compression or setting ofETags happen to the response, so it must
+ come after ``GZipMiddleware``, ``CommonMiddleware`` and
+ ``ConditionalGetMiddleware`` in the list. It also must come after
+ ``CsrfViewMiddleware``.
+
+Use of the ``CsrfResponseMiddleware`` is not recommended because of the
+performance hit it imposes, and because of a potential security problem (see
+below). It can be used as an interim measure until applications have been
+updated to use the :ttag:`csrf_token` tag. It is deprecated and will be
+removed in Django 1.4.
+
+Django 1.1 and earlier provided a single ``CsrfMiddleware`` class. This is also
+still available for backwards compatibility. It combines the functions of the
+two middleware.
+
+Note also that previous versions of these classes depended on the sessions
+framework, but this dependency has now been removed, with backward compatibility
+support so that upgrading will not produce any issues.
+
+Security of legacy method
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+The post-processing ``CsrfResponseMiddleware`` adds the CSRF token to all POST
+forms (unless the view has been decorated with ``csrf_response_exempt``). If
+the POST form has an external untrusted site as its target, rather than an
+internal page, that site will be sent the CSRF token when the form is submitted.
+Armed with this leaked information, that site will then be able to successfully
+launch a CSRF attack on your site against that user. The
+``@csrf_response_exempt`` decorator can be used to fix this, but only if the
+page doesn't also contain internal forms that require the token.
+
+.. _ref-csrf-upgrading-notes:
+
+Upgrading notes
+---------------
+
+When upgrading to version 1.2 or later, you may have applications that rely on
+the old post-processing functionality for CSRF protection, or you may not have
+enabled any CSRF protection. This section outlines the steps necessary for a
+smooth upgrade, without having to fix all the applications to use the new
+template tag method immediately.
+
+First of all, the location of the middleware and related functions have
+changed. There are backwards compatible stub files so that old imports will
+continue to work for now, but they are deprecated and will be removed in Django
+1.4. The following changes have been made:
+
+ * Middleware have been moved to ``django.middleware.csrf``
+ * Decorators have been moved to ``django.views.decorators.csrf``
+
+====================================================== ==============================================
+ Old New
+====================================================== ==============================================
+django.contrib.csrf.middleware.CsrfMiddleware django.middleware.csrf.CsrfMiddleware
+django.contrib.csrf.middleware.CsrfViewMiddleware django.middleware.csrf.CsrfViewMiddleware
+django.contrib.csrf.middleware.CsrfResponseMiddleware django.middleware.csrf.CsrfResponseMiddleware
+django.contrib.csrf.middleware.csrf_exempt django.views.decorators.csrf.csrf_exempt
+django.contrib.csrf.middleware.csrf_view_exempt django.views.decorators.csrf.csrf_view_exempt
+django.contrib.csrf.middleware.csrf_response_exempt django.views.decorators.csrf.csrf_response_exempt
+====================================================== ==============================================
+
+You should update any imports, and also the paths in your
+:setting:`MIDDLEWARE_CLASSES`.
+
+If you have ``CsrfMiddleware`` in your :setting:`MIDDLEWARE_CLASSES`, you will now
+have a working installation with CSRF protection. It is recommended at this
+point that you replace ``CsrfMiddleware`` with its two components,
+``CsrfViewMiddleware`` and ``CsrfResponseMiddleware`` (in that order).
+
+If you do not have any of the middleware in your :setting:`MIDDLEWARE_CLASSES`,
+you will have a working installation but without any CSRF protection for your
+views (just as you had before). It is strongly recommended to install
+``CsrfViewMiddleware`` and ``CsrfResponseMiddleware``, as described above.
+
+Note that contrib apps, such as the admin, have been updated to use the
+``csrf_protect`` decorator, so that they are secured even if you do not add the
+``CsrfViewMiddleware`` to your settings. However, if you have supplied
+customised templates to any of the view functions of contrib apps (whether
+explicitly via a keyword argument, or by overriding built-in templates), **you
+MUST update them** to include the :ttag:`csrf_token` template tag as described
+above, or they will stop working. (If you cannot update these templates for
+some reason, you will be forced to use ``CsrfResponseMiddleware`` for these
+views to continue working).
+
+Note also, if you are using the comments app, and you are not going to add
+``CsrfViewMiddleware`` to your settings (not recommended), you will need to add
+the ``csrf_protect`` decorator to any views that include the comment forms and
+target the comment views (usually using the :ttag:`comment_form_target` template
+tag).
+
+Assuming you have followed the above, all views in your Django site will now be
+protected by the ``CsrfViewMiddleware``. Contrib apps meet the requirements
+imposed by the ``CsrfViewMiddleware`` using the template tag, and other
+applications in your project will meet its requirements by virtue of the
+``CsrfResponseMiddleware``.
+
+The next step is to update all your applications to use the template tag, as
+described in `How to use it`_, steps 2-3. This can be done as soon as is
+practical. Any applications that are updated will now require Django 1.1.2 or
+later, since they will use the CSRF template tag which was not available in
+earlier versions. (The template tag in 1.1.2 is actually a no-op that exists
+solely to ease the transition to 1.2 — it allows apps to be created that have
+CSRF protection under 1.2 without requiring users of the apps to upgrade to the
+Django 1.2.X series).
+
+The utility script ``extras/csrf_migration_helper.py`` can help to automate the
+finding of code and templates that may need to be upgraded. It contains full
+help on how to use it.
+
+Finally, once all applications are upgraded, ``CsrfResponseMiddleware`` can be
+removed from your settings.
+
+While ``CsrfResponseMiddleware`` is still in use, the ``csrf_response_exempt``
+decorator, described in `Exceptions`_, may be useful. The post-processing
+middleware imposes a performance hit and a potential vulnerability, and any
+views that have been upgraded to use the new template tag method no longer need
+it.
+
+Exceptions
+----------
+
+.. versionadded:: 1.1
+.. versionchanged:: 1.2
+ Import paths for the decorators below were changed.
+
+To manually exclude a view function from being handled by either of the two CSRF
+middleware, you can use the ``csrf_exempt`` decorator, found in the
+``django.views.decorators.csrf`` module. For example::
+
+ from django.views.decorators.csrf import csrf_exempt
+
+ @csrf_exempt
+ def my_view(request):
+ return HttpResponse('Hello world')
+
+Like the middleware, the ``csrf_exempt`` decorator is composed of two parts: a
+``csrf_view_exempt`` decorator and a ``csrf_response_exempt`` decorator, found
+in the same module. These disable the view protection mechanism
+(``CsrfViewMiddleware``) and the response post-processing
+(``CsrfResponseMiddleware``) respectively. They can be used individually if
+required.
+
+You don't have to worry about doing this for most AJAX views. Any request sent
+with "X-Requested-With: XMLHttpRequest" is automatically exempt. (See the `How
+it works`_ section.)
+
+Subdomains
+----------
+
+By default, CSRF cookies are specific to the subdomain they are set for. This
+means that a form served from one subdomain (e.g. server1.example.com) will not
+be able to have a target on another subdomain (e.g. server2.example.com). This
+restriction can be removed by setting :setting:`CSRF_COOKIE_DOMAIN` to be
+something like ``".example.com"``.
+
+Please note that, with or without use of this setting, this CSRF protection
+mechanism is not safe against cross-subdomain attacks -- see `Limitations`_.
+
+Rejected requests
+=================
+
+By default, a '403 Forbidden' response is sent to the user if an incoming
+request fails the checks performed by ``CsrfViewMiddleware``. This should
+usually only be seen when there is a genuine Cross Site Request Forgery, or
+when, due to a programming error, the CSRF token has not been included with a
+POST form.
+
+No logging is done, and the error message is not very friendly, so you may want
+to provide your own page for handling this condition. To do this, simply set
+the :setting:`CSRF_FAILURE_VIEW` setting to a dotted path to your own view
+function, which should have the following signature::
+
+ def csrf_failure(request, reason="")
+
+where ``reason`` is a short message (intended for developers or logging, not for
+end users) indicating the reason the request was rejected.
+
+How it works
+============
+
+The CSRF protection is based on the following things:
+
+1. A CSRF cookie that is set to a random value (a session independent nonce, as
+ it is called), which other sites will not have access to.
+
+ This cookie is set by ``CsrfViewMiddleware``. It is meant to be permanent,
+ but since there is no way to set a cookie that never expires, it is sent with
+ every response that has called ``django.middleware.csrf.get_token()``
+ (the function used internally to retrieve the CSRF token).
+
+2. A hidden form field with the name 'csrfmiddlewaretoken' present in all
+ outgoing POST forms. The value of this field is the value of the CSRF
+ cookie.
+
+ This part is done by the template tag (and with the legacy method, it is done
+ by ``CsrfResponseMiddleware``).
+
+3. For all incoming POST requests, a CSRF cookie must be present, and the
+ 'csrfmiddlewaretoken' field must be present and correct. If it isn't, the
+ user will get a 403 error.
+
+ This check is done by ``CsrfViewMiddleware``.
+
+4. In addition, for HTTPS requests, strict referer checking is done by
+ ``CsrfViewMiddleware``. This is necessary to address a Man-In-The-Middle
+ attack that is possible under HTTPS when using a session independent nonce,
+ due to the fact that HTTP 'Set-Cookie' headers are (unfortunately) accepted
+ by clients that are talking to a site under HTTPS. (Referer checking is not
+ done for HTTP requests because the presence of the Referer header is not
+ reliable enough under HTTP.)
+
+This ensures that only forms that have originated from your Web site can be used
+to POST data back.
+
+It deliberately only targets HTTP POST requests (and the corresponding POST
+forms). GET requests ought never to have any potentially dangerous side effects
+(see `9.1.1 Safe Methods, HTTP 1.1, RFC 2616`_), and so a CSRF attack with a GET
+request ought to be harmless.
+
+``CsrfResponseMiddleware`` checks the Content-Type before modifying the
+response, and only pages that are served as 'text/html' or
+'application/xml+xhtml' are modified.
+
+AJAX
+----
+
+The middleware tries to be smart about requests that come in via AJAX. Most
+modern JavaScript toolkits send an "X-Requested-With: XMLHttpRequest" HTTP
+header; these requests are detected and automatically *not* handled by this
+middleware. We can do this safely because, in the context of a browser, the
+header can only be added by using ``XMLHttpRequest``, and browsers already
+implement a same-domain policy for ``XMLHttpRequest``.
+
+For the more recent browsers that relax this same-domain policy, custom headers
+like "X-Requested-With" are only allowed after the browser has done a
+'preflight' check to the server to see if the cross-domain request is allowed,
+using a strictly 'opt in' mechanism, so the exception for AJAX is still safe—if
+the developer has specifically opted in to allowing cross-site AJAX POST
+requests on a specific URL, they obviously don't want the middleware to disallow
+exactly that.
+
+.. _9.1.1 Safe Methods, HTTP 1.1, RFC 2616: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec9.html
+
+Caching
+=======
+
+If the :ttag:`csrf_token` template tag is used by a template (or the ``get_token``
+function is called some other way), ``CsrfViewMiddleware`` will add a cookie and
+a ``Vary: Cookie`` header to the response. Similarly,
+``CsrfResponseMiddleware`` will send the ``Vary: Cookie`` header if it inserted
+a token. This means that these middleware will play well with the cache
+middleware if it is used as instructed (``UpdateCacheMiddleware`` goes before
+all other middleware).
+
+However, if you use cache decorators on individual views, the CSRF middleware
+will not yet have been able to set the Vary header. In this case, on any views
+that will require a CSRF token to be inserted you should use the
+:func:`django.views.decorators.vary.vary_on_cookie` decorator first::
+
+ from django.views.decorators.cache import cache_page
+ from django.views.decorators.vary import vary_on_cookie
+
+ @cache_page(60 * 15)
+ @vary_on_cookie
+ def my_view(request):
+ # ...
+
+
+Testing
+=======
+
+The ``CsrfViewMiddleware`` will usually be a big hindrance to testing view
+functions, due to the need for the CSRF token which must be sent with every POST
+request. For this reason, Django's HTTP client for tests has been modified to
+set a flag on requests which relaxes the middleware and the ``csrf_protect``
+decorator so that they no longer rejects requests. In every other respect
+(e.g. sending cookies etc.), they behave the same.
+
+If, for some reason, you *want* the test client to perform CSRF
+checks, you can create an instance of the test client that enforces
+CSRF checks::
+
+ >>> from django.test import Client
+ >>> csrf_client = Client(enforce_csrf_checks=True)
+
+Limitations
+===========
+
+Subdomains within a site will be able to set cookies on the client for the whole
+domain. By setting the cookie and using a corresponding token, subdomains will
+be able to circumvent the CSRF protection. The only way to avoid this is to
+ensure that subdomains are controlled by trusted users (or, are at least unable
+to set cookies). Note that even without CSRF, there are other vulnerabilities,
+such as session fixation, that make giving subdomains to untrusted parties a bad
+idea, and these vulnerabilities cannot easily be fixed with current browsers.
+
+If you are using ``CsrfResponseMiddleware`` and your app creates HTML pages and
+forms in some unusual way, (e.g. it sends fragments of HTML in JavaScript
+document.write statements) you might bypass the filter that adds the hidden
+field to the form, in which case form submission will always fail. You should
+use the template tag or :meth:`django.middleware.csrf.get_token` to get
+the CSRF token and ensure it is included when your form is submitted.
+
+Contrib and reusable apps
+=========================
+
+Because it is possible for the developer to turn off the ``CsrfViewMiddleware``,
+all relevant views in contrib apps use the ``csrf_protect`` decorator to ensure
+the security of these applications against CSRF. It is recommended that the
+developers of other reusable apps that want the same guarantees also use the
+``csrf_protect`` decorator on their views.