summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/3542/CH4/EX4.7/Ex4_7.sce
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '3542/CH4/EX4.7/Ex4_7.sce')
-rw-r--r--3542/CH4/EX4.7/Ex4_7.sce48
1 files changed, 48 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/3542/CH4/EX4.7/Ex4_7.sce b/3542/CH4/EX4.7/Ex4_7.sce
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..fb42e8739
--- /dev/null
+++ b/3542/CH4/EX4.7/Ex4_7.sce
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+// Example no 4.7
+// To compute diffraction loss and identify Fresnel zone within which tip of obstruction lies for a)h=25m b)h=0 c)h=-25m
+// Page no. 132
+
+clc;
+clear;
+
+// Given data
+lambda=1/3; // Wavelength in meter
+d1=1*10^3; // Distance between transmitter and obstructing screen in m
+d2=1*10^3; // Distance between receiver and obstructing screen in m
+
+// a) For h=25m
+h=25; // Effective heigth of obstruction screen in m
+v=h*sqrt((2*(d1+d2))/(lambda*d1*d2)); // Fresnel diffraction parameter
+printf('\n a) For h=25m Fresnel diffraction parameter v = %0.2f',v);
+printf('\n From the plot of Knife-edge diffraction gain as a function of Fresnel diffraction parameter, diffraction loss is 22dB.');
+Gd=-20*log10(0.225/v); // Diffraction loss for v>2.4 in dB
+printf('\n Using numerical approximation, diffraction loss for v > 2.4 = %0.1f dB',Gd);
+delta=(h^2/2)*((d1+d2)/(d1*d2)); // Path length difference between direct and diffracted rays
+n=(2*delta)/lambda; // Number of Fresnel zones in which the obstruction lies
+printf('\n Fresnel zone within which tip of obstruction lies = %0.2f',n);
+printf('\n Therefore, the tip of obstruction completely blocks the first three Fresnel zones.');
+
+// b) For h=0
+h=0; // Effective heigth of obstruction screen in m
+v=h*sqrt((2*(d1+d2))/(lambda*d1*d2)); // Fresnel diffraction parameter
+printf('\n \n b) For h=0 Fresnel diffraction parameter v = %0.0f',v);
+printf('\n From the plot of Knife-edge diffraction gain as a function of Fresnel diffraction parameter, diffraction loss is 6dB.');
+Gd=-20*log10(0.5-0.62*v); // Diffraction loss for v=0 in dB
+printf('\n Using numerical approximation, diffraction loss for v=0 = %0.0f dB',Gd);
+delta=(h^2/2)*((d1+d2)/(d1*d2)); // Path length difference between direct and diffracted rays
+n=(2*delta)/lambda; // Number of Fresnel zones in which the obstruction lies
+printf('\n Fresnel zone within which tip of obstruction lies = %0.0f',n);
+printf('\n Therefore, the tip of obstruction lies in middle of first Fresnel zone.');
+
+// c) For h=-25m
+h=-25; // Effective heigth of obstruction screen in m
+v=h*sqrt((2*(d1+d2))/(lambda*d1*d2)); // Fresnel diffraction parameter
+printf('\n \n c) For h=-25m Fresnel diffraction parameter v = %0.2f',v);
+printf('\n From the plot of Knife-edge diffraction gain as a function of Fresnel diffraction parameter, diffraction loss is approximately 1dB.');
+Gd=0; // Diffraction loss for v<-1 in dB
+printf('\n Using numerical approximation, diffraction loss for v < -1 = %0.0f in dB',Gd);
+delta=(h^2/2)*((d1+d2)/(d1*d2)); // Path length difference between direct and diffracted rays
+n=(2*delta)/lambda; // Number of Fresnel zones in which the obstruction lies
+printf('\n Fresnel zone within which tip of obstruction lies = %0.2f',n);
+printf('\n Therefore, the tip of obstruction completely blocks the first three Fresnel zones but diffraction loss is negligible.');
+