1 files changed, 19 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/2825/CH14/EX14.10/Ex14_10.sce b/2825/CH14/EX14.10/Ex14_10.sce
index 62b0ff629..c242f8e5a 100755
--- a/2825/CH14/EX14.10/Ex14_10.sce
+++ b/2825/CH14/EX14.10/Ex14_10.sce
@@ -1,19 +1,19 @@
-//Ex14_10 Pg-698
-clc
-
-n1=1.48 //core refracrive index
-n2=1.47 //cladding refractive index
-lamda=850e-6 //cut-off wavelength
-V=2.405 //normalised frequency
-//In the book cut off wavelength in the question is 850 um but in
-// the calcution part it is taken as 850nm. Here I've taken 850um 
-d=V*lamda/(%pi*sqrt(n1^2-n2^2)) //diamter of core
-a=d/2 //radius of core
-printf("Radius of core = %.2f mm \n",a*1e3)//answer in the book is wrong
-
-NA=sqrt(n1^2-n2^2) //numerical apperture
-printf(" Numerical apperture = %.4f \n",NA)
-
-AA_rad=asin(NA/n) //maximum Acceptance angle in rad
-AA=AA_rad*180/%pi //maximum entrance angle in degree
-printf(" Acceptance angle i0 = %.2f degree \n",AA)
+//Ex14_10 Pg-698
+clc
+
+n1=1.48 //core refracrive index
+n2=1.47 //cladding refractive index
+lamda=850e-6 //cut-off wavelength
+V=2.405 //normalised frequency
+//In the book cut off wavelength in the question is 850 um but in
+// the calcution part it is taken as 850nm. Here I've taken 850um 
+d=V*lamda/(%pi*sqrt(n1^2-n2^2)) //diamter of core
+a=d/2 //radius of core
+printf("Radius of core = %.2f mm \n",a*1e3)//answer in the book is wrong
+
+NA=sqrt(n1^2-n2^2) //numerical apperture
+printf(" Numerical apperture = %.4f \n",NA)
+
+AA_rad=asin(NA) //maximum Acceptance angle in rad
+AA=AA_rad*180/%pi //maximum entrance angle in degree
+printf(" Acceptance angle i0 = %.2f degree \n",AA)
+\ No newline at end of file