summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/2102/CH3/EX3.6/exa_3_6.sce
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '2102/CH3/EX3.6/exa_3_6.sce')
-rwxr-xr-x2102/CH3/EX3.6/exa_3_6.sce20
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/2102/CH3/EX3.6/exa_3_6.sce b/2102/CH3/EX3.6/exa_3_6.sce
new file mode 100755
index 000000000..ff9fa013f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2102/CH3/EX3.6/exa_3_6.sce
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+// Exa 3.6
+clc;
+clear;
+close;
+// Given data
+J=10^4;// in A/m^2
+Jo=200;// in mA/m^2
+Jo= Jo*10^-3;// in A/m^2
+T=300;// in K
+V_T= T/11600;// in V
+e=1.6*10^-19;// electrone charge
+k= 1.38*10^-23;
+n=1;// assuming value
+//Formula I= Io*(%e^(e*V/(n*k*T))-1) and after dividing both the sides by area of the junction, we have
+// J= Jo*(%e^(e*V/(n*k*T)));// approx by neglecting 1
+V= n*k*T*log(J/Jo)/e;
+disp(V,"Voltage to be applied across the junction in volt is")
+
+// Note:- In the book, the value of T (i.e. 300) has not been putted to evaluate the value of V. So if we'll not put the value of T to evaluate the value of V, then the answer of coding will be same as book. Hence the
+// the answer in the book is wrong.