Moved, renamed, and deleted files

The original directory structure was scattered and unorganized.
Changes are basically to make it look like kernel structure.

1 files changed, 240 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpupri.c b/kernel/sched/cpupri.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d72586fd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpupri.c
@@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
+/*
+ *  kernel/sched/cpupri.c
+ *
+ *  CPU priority management
+ *
+ *  Copyright (C) 2007-2008 Novell
+ *
+ *  Author: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
+ *
+ *  This code tracks the priority of each CPU so that global migration
+ *  decisions are easy to calculate.  Each CPU can be in a state as follows:
+ *
+ *                 (INVALID), IDLE, NORMAL, RT1, ... RT99
+ *
+ *  going from the lowest priority to the highest.  CPUs in the INVALID state
+ *  are not eligible for routing.  The system maintains this state with
+ *  a 2 dimensional bitmap (the first for priority class, the second for cpus
+ *  in that class).  Therefore a typical application without affinity
+ *  restrictions can find a suitable CPU with O(1) complexity (e.g. two bit
+ *  searches).  For tasks with affinity restrictions, the algorithm has a
+ *  worst case complexity of O(min(102, nr_domcpus)), though the scenario that
+ *  yields the worst case search is fairly contrived.
+ *
+ *  This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ *  modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
+ *  as published by the Free Software Foundation; version 2
+ *  of the License.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/gfp.h>
+#include "cpupri.h"
+
+/* Convert between a 140 based task->prio, and our 102 based cpupri */
+static int convert_prio(int prio)
+{
+	int cpupri;
+
+	if (prio == CPUPRI_INVALID)
+		cpupri = CPUPRI_INVALID;
+	else if (prio == MAX_PRIO)
+		cpupri = CPUPRI_IDLE;
+	else if (prio >= MAX_RT_PRIO)
+		cpupri = CPUPRI_NORMAL;
+	else
+		cpupri = MAX_RT_PRIO - prio + 1;
+
+	return cpupri;
+}
+
+/**
+ * cpupri_find - find the best (lowest-pri) CPU in the system
+ * @cp: The cpupri context
+ * @p: The task
+ * @lowest_mask: A mask to fill in with selected CPUs (or NULL)
+ *
+ * Note: This function returns the recommended CPUs as calculated during the
+ * current invocation.  By the time the call returns, the CPUs may have in
+ * fact changed priorities any number of times.  While not ideal, it is not
+ * an issue of correctness since the normal rebalancer logic will correct
+ * any discrepancies created by racing against the uncertainty of the current
+ * priority configuration.
+ *
+ * Returns: (int)bool - CPUs were found
+ */
+int cpupri_find(struct cpupri *cp, struct task_struct *p,
+		struct cpumask *lowest_mask)
+{
+	int                  idx      = 0;
+	int                  task_pri = convert_prio(p->prio);
+
+	if (task_pri >= MAX_RT_PRIO)
+		return 0;
+
+	for (idx = 0; idx < task_pri; idx++) {
+		struct cpupri_vec *vec  = &cp->pri_to_cpu[idx];
+		int skip = 0;
+
+		if (!atomic_read(&(vec)->count))
+			skip = 1;
+		/*
+		 * When looking at the vector, we need to read the counter,
+		 * do a memory barrier, then read the mask.
+		 *
+		 * Note: This is still all racey, but we can deal with it.
+		 *  Ideally, we only want to look at masks that are set.
+		 *
+		 *  If a mask is not set, then the only thing wrong is that we
+		 *  did a little more work than necessary.
+		 *
+		 *  If we read a zero count but the mask is set, because of the
+		 *  memory barriers, that can only happen when the highest prio
+		 *  task for a run queue has left the run queue, in which case,
+		 *  it will be followed by a pull. If the task we are processing
+		 *  fails to find a proper place to go, that pull request will
+		 *  pull this task if the run queue is running at a lower
+		 *  priority.
+		 */
+		smp_rmb();
+
+		/* Need to do the rmb for every iteration */
+		if (skip)
+			continue;
+
+		if (cpumask_any_and(&p->cpus_allowed, vec->mask) >= nr_cpu_ids)
+			continue;
+
+		if (lowest_mask) {
+			cpumask_and(lowest_mask, &p->cpus_allowed, vec->mask);
+
+			/*
+			 * We have to ensure that we have at least one bit
+			 * still set in the array, since the map could have
+			 * been concurrently emptied between the first and
+			 * second reads of vec->mask.  If we hit this
+			 * condition, simply act as though we never hit this
+			 * priority level and continue on.
+			 */
+			if (cpumask_any(lowest_mask) >= nr_cpu_ids)
+				continue;
+		}
+
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * cpupri_set - update the cpu priority setting
+ * @cp: The cpupri context
+ * @cpu: The target cpu
+ * @newpri: The priority (INVALID-RT99) to assign to this CPU
+ *
+ * Note: Assumes cpu_rq(cpu)->lock is locked
+ *
+ * Returns: (void)
+ */
+void cpupri_set(struct cpupri *cp, int cpu, int newpri)
+{
+	int                 *currpri = &cp->cpu_to_pri[cpu];
+	int                  oldpri  = *currpri;
+	int                  do_mb = 0;
+
+	newpri = convert_prio(newpri);
+
+	BUG_ON(newpri >= CPUPRI_NR_PRIORITIES);
+
+	if (newpri == oldpri)
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * If the cpu was currently mapped to a different value, we
+	 * need to map it to the new value then remove the old value.
+	 * Note, we must add the new value first, otherwise we risk the
+	 * cpu being missed by the priority loop in cpupri_find.
+	 */
+	if (likely(newpri != CPUPRI_INVALID)) {
+		struct cpupri_vec *vec = &cp->pri_to_cpu[newpri];
+
+		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, vec->mask);
+		/*
+		 * When adding a new vector, we update the mask first,
+		 * do a write memory barrier, and then update the count, to
+		 * make sure the vector is visible when count is set.
+		 */
+		smp_mb__before_atomic_inc();
+		atomic_inc(&(vec)->count);
+		do_mb = 1;
+	}
+	if (likely(oldpri != CPUPRI_INVALID)) {
+		struct cpupri_vec *vec  = &cp->pri_to_cpu[oldpri];
+
+		/*
+		 * Because the order of modification of the vec->count
+		 * is important, we must make sure that the update
+		 * of the new prio is seen before we decrement the
+		 * old prio. This makes sure that the loop sees
+		 * one or the other when we raise the priority of
+		 * the run queue. We don't care about when we lower the
+		 * priority, as that will trigger an rt pull anyway.
+		 *
+		 * We only need to do a memory barrier if we updated
+		 * the new priority vec.
+		 */
+		if (do_mb)
+			smp_mb__after_atomic_inc();
+
+		/*
+		 * When removing from the vector, we decrement the counter first
+		 * do a memory barrier and then clear the mask.
+		 */
+		atomic_dec(&(vec)->count);
+		smp_mb__after_atomic_inc();
+		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, vec->mask);
+	}
+
+	*currpri = newpri;
+}
+
+/**
+ * cpupri_init - initialize the cpupri structure
+ * @cp: The cpupri context
+ *
+ * Returns: -ENOMEM if memory fails.
+ */
+int cpupri_init(struct cpupri *cp)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	memset(cp, 0, sizeof(*cp));
+
+	for (i = 0; i < CPUPRI_NR_PRIORITIES; i++) {
+		struct cpupri_vec *vec = &cp->pri_to_cpu[i];
+
+		atomic_set(&vec->count, 0);
+		if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&vec->mask, GFP_KERNEL))
+			goto cleanup;
+	}
+
+	for_each_possible_cpu(i)
+		cp->cpu_to_pri[i] = CPUPRI_INVALID;
+	return 0;
+
+cleanup:
+	for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
+		free_cpumask_var(cp->pri_to_cpu[i].mask);
+	return -ENOMEM;
+}
+
+/**
+ * cpupri_cleanup - clean up the cpupri structure
+ * @cp: The cpupri context
+ */
+void cpupri_cleanup(struct cpupri *cp)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < CPUPRI_NR_PRIORITIES; i++)
+		free_cpumask_var(cp->pri_to_cpu[i].mask);
+}