From b1f5c3f8d6671b4331cef1dcebdf63b7a43a3a2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: priyanka
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 15:03:17 +0530
Subject: initial commit / add all books

---
 680/CH15/EX15.02/15_02.sce | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
 create mode 100755 680/CH15/EX15.02/15_02.sce

(limited to '680/CH15/EX15.02/15_02.sce')

diff --git a/680/CH15/EX15.02/15_02.sce b/680/CH15/EX15.02/15_02.sce
new file mode 100755
index 000000000..ef467de3b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/680/CH15/EX15.02/15_02.sce
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+//Problem 15.02:
+
+//initializing the variables:
+
+//calculation:
+//The first step is to convert the equipment, installation, and operating costs to total\ncosts by multiplying each by the total gas flow, 100,000 acfm. Hence, for the finned exchanger,
+//the total costs are
+Equipmentcost = 100000*3.1 // in $
+Installationcost = 100000*0.80 // in $
+Operatingcost = 100000*0.06 // in $
+//Note that the operating costs are on an annualized basis. The equipment cost and the installation\ncost must then be converted to an annual basis using the CRF. From Equation (15.3)
+CRF = (0.1)*(1+0.1)^20/[(1+0.1)^20 - 1]
+//The annual costs for the equipment and the installation is given by the product of the CRF and\nthe total costs of each:
+Equipmentannualcost = 0.11746*Equipmentcost
+Installationannualcost = 0.11746*Installationcost
+//The calculations for the 4-pass and the 2-pass exchangers are performed in the same manner.\nThe three preheaters can be compared after all the annual costs are added. The tabulated results\nare provided in Table 15.5. 
+// total annual costs
+CF = 65000
+C4 = 77385
+C2 = 60111
+
+printf("\n\nResult\n\n")
+printf("\n According to the analysis, Total Annual Costs for Finned exchanger = $%.0f, for 4-Pass Exchanger = $%.0f and for 2-Pass Exchanger = $%.0f.\nTherefore 2-pass exchanger is the most economically attractive device since the annual cost is the lowest.",CF,C4,C2)
-- 
cgit