From 7f60ea012dd2524dae921a2a35adbf7ef21f2bb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: prashantsinalkar
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 12:27:19 +0530
Subject: initial commit / add all books

---
 3682/CH7/EX7.9/Ex7_9.sce | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 3682/CH7/EX7.9/Ex7_9.sce

(limited to '3682/CH7/EX7.9/Ex7_9.sce')

diff --git a/3682/CH7/EX7.9/Ex7_9.sce b/3682/CH7/EX7.9/Ex7_9.sce
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e4a98d7da
--- /dev/null
+++ b/3682/CH7/EX7.9/Ex7_9.sce
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+// Exa 7.9
+
+clc;
+clear;
+
+// Given data
+
+fo=10; // Hz
+
+// Solution
+
+disp(" For a switched capacitor integrator, assume fCK=1000 Hz.");
+fCK=1000; // Hz
+ disp(" From Eq. (7.129) on page no. 293, we get, ");
+ disp(" Cf/C1 =x= fCK/(2*%pi*fo). ");  // x = ratio of Cf by C1
+x=fCK/(2*%pi*fo);
+disp(" Lets choose cF=15.9 pF.");
+cF=15.9*10^-12; // Farads
+C1=cF/x;
+printf('  By calculation C1 = %d pF.\n ',round(C1*10^12));
+disp(" For RC integrator, select R1=1.6*10^6 Ω.") ;
+R1=1.6*10^6; // Ω
+cF1=1/(2*%pi*R1*fo); 
+printf('  By calculation cF = %d nF. \n',round(cF1*10^9));
+disp("");
+printf('  The values of R1 = 1.6 mHz and cF = 10nF are not quite practical for a monolothic circuit.\n      From this, it is obvious that switched capacitor circuits are more practical so far as IC fabrication is concerned.\n  So it can be seen that an SC integrator requires very low values of capacitance compared to lossy integrator.');
+disp("");
+printf('  If a resistor R2 is placed in parallel with the feedback capacitor cF of Fig. 7.26(a), a lossy or practical integrator is obtained. \n  The transfer function for this circuit is given in Eq. (7.130) and (7.131) on page no. 294.' );
+
+printf('\n \n  The switched capacitor implementation of Fig. 7.26(a) is shown in Fig. 7.26(b)\n  where resistors R1 and R2 have been replaced by switched capacitors C1 and C2 and its MOS version is in Fig. 7.26(c).');
-- 
cgit