From 7f60ea012dd2524dae921a2a35adbf7ef21f2bb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: prashantsinalkar Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 12:27:19 +0530 Subject: initial commit / add all books --- 3542/CH4/EX4.7/4_7.jpg | Bin 0 -> 176422 bytes 3542/CH4/EX4.7/Ex4_7.sce | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+) create mode 100644 3542/CH4/EX4.7/4_7.jpg create mode 100644 3542/CH4/EX4.7/Ex4_7.sce (limited to '3542/CH4/EX4.7') diff --git a/3542/CH4/EX4.7/4_7.jpg b/3542/CH4/EX4.7/4_7.jpg new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e95eb61f8 Binary files /dev/null and b/3542/CH4/EX4.7/4_7.jpg differ diff --git a/3542/CH4/EX4.7/Ex4_7.sce b/3542/CH4/EX4.7/Ex4_7.sce new file mode 100644 index 000000000..fb42e8739 --- /dev/null +++ b/3542/CH4/EX4.7/Ex4_7.sce @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +// Example no 4.7 +// To compute diffraction loss and identify Fresnel zone within which tip of obstruction lies for a)h=25m b)h=0 c)h=-25m +// Page no. 132 + +clc; +clear; + +// Given data +lambda=1/3; // Wavelength in meter +d1=1*10^3; // Distance between transmitter and obstructing screen in m +d2=1*10^3; // Distance between receiver and obstructing screen in m + +// a) For h=25m +h=25; // Effective heigth of obstruction screen in m +v=h*sqrt((2*(d1+d2))/(lambda*d1*d2)); // Fresnel diffraction parameter +printf('\n a) For h=25m Fresnel diffraction parameter v = %0.2f',v); +printf('\n From the plot of Knife-edge diffraction gain as a function of Fresnel diffraction parameter, diffraction loss is 22dB.'); +Gd=-20*log10(0.225/v); // Diffraction loss for v>2.4 in dB +printf('\n Using numerical approximation, diffraction loss for v > 2.4 = %0.1f dB',Gd); +delta=(h^2/2)*((d1+d2)/(d1*d2)); // Path length difference between direct and diffracted rays +n=(2*delta)/lambda; // Number of Fresnel zones in which the obstruction lies +printf('\n Fresnel zone within which tip of obstruction lies = %0.2f',n); +printf('\n Therefore, the tip of obstruction completely blocks the first three Fresnel zones.'); + +// b) For h=0 +h=0; // Effective heigth of obstruction screen in m +v=h*sqrt((2*(d1+d2))/(lambda*d1*d2)); // Fresnel diffraction parameter +printf('\n \n b) For h=0 Fresnel diffraction parameter v = %0.0f',v); +printf('\n From the plot of Knife-edge diffraction gain as a function of Fresnel diffraction parameter, diffraction loss is 6dB.'); +Gd=-20*log10(0.5-0.62*v); // Diffraction loss for v=0 in dB +printf('\n Using numerical approximation, diffraction loss for v=0 = %0.0f dB',Gd); +delta=(h^2/2)*((d1+d2)/(d1*d2)); // Path length difference between direct and diffracted rays +n=(2*delta)/lambda; // Number of Fresnel zones in which the obstruction lies +printf('\n Fresnel zone within which tip of obstruction lies = %0.0f',n); +printf('\n Therefore, the tip of obstruction lies in middle of first Fresnel zone.'); + +// c) For h=-25m +h=-25; // Effective heigth of obstruction screen in m +v=h*sqrt((2*(d1+d2))/(lambda*d1*d2)); // Fresnel diffraction parameter +printf('\n \n c) For h=-25m Fresnel diffraction parameter v = %0.2f',v); +printf('\n From the plot of Knife-edge diffraction gain as a function of Fresnel diffraction parameter, diffraction loss is approximately 1dB.'); +Gd=0; // Diffraction loss for v<-1 in dB +printf('\n Using numerical approximation, diffraction loss for v < -1 = %0.0f in dB',Gd); +delta=(h^2/2)*((d1+d2)/(d1*d2)); // Path length difference between direct and diffracted rays +n=(2*delta)/lambda; // Number of Fresnel zones in which the obstruction lies +printf('\n Fresnel zone within which tip of obstruction lies = %0.2f',n); +printf('\n Therefore, the tip of obstruction completely blocks the first three Fresnel zones but diffraction loss is negligible.'); + -- cgit