Moved, renamed, and deleted files

The original directory structure was scattered and unorganized.
Changes are basically to make it look like kernel structure.

1 files changed, 79 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..257d9cca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 1994 Linus Torvalds
+ *
+ * Pentium III FXSR, SSE support
+ * General FPU state handling cleanups
+ *	Gareth Hughes <gareth@valinux.com>, May 2000
+ * x86-64 work by Andi Kleen 2002
+ */
+
+#ifndef _ASM_X86_I387_H
+#define _ASM_X86_I387_H
+
+#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
+
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/hardirq.h>
+
+struct pt_regs;
+struct user_i387_struct;
+
+extern int init_fpu(struct task_struct *child);
+extern int dump_fpu(struct pt_regs *, struct user_i387_struct *);
+extern void math_state_restore(void);
+
+extern bool irq_fpu_usable(void);
+extern void kernel_fpu_begin(void);
+extern void kernel_fpu_end(void);
+
+/*
+ * Some instructions like VIA's padlock instructions generate a spurious
+ * DNA fault but don't modify SSE registers. And these instructions
+ * get used from interrupt context as well. To prevent these kernel instructions
+ * in interrupt context interacting wrongly with other user/kernel fpu usage, we
+ * should use them only in the context of irq_ts_save/restore()
+ */
+static inline int irq_ts_save(void)
+{
+	/*
+	 * If in process context and not atomic, we can take a spurious DNA fault.
+	 * Otherwise, doing clts() in process context requires disabling preemption
+	 * or some heavy lifting like kernel_fpu_begin()
+	 */
+	if (!in_atomic())
+		return 0;
+
+	if (read_cr0() & X86_CR0_TS) {
+		clts();
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static inline void irq_ts_restore(int TS_state)
+{
+	if (TS_state)
+		stts();
+}
+
+/*
+ * The question "does this thread have fpu access?"
+ * is slightly racy, since preemption could come in
+ * and revoke it immediately after the test.
+ *
+ * However, even in that very unlikely scenario,
+ * we can just assume we have FPU access - typically
+ * to save the FP state - we'll just take a #NM
+ * fault and get the FPU access back.
+ */
+static inline int user_has_fpu(void)
+{
+	return current->thread.fpu.has_fpu;
+}
+
+extern void unlazy_fpu(struct task_struct *tsk);
+
+#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
+
+#endif /* _ASM_X86_I387_H */