1 files changed, 60 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/newstructure/thirdparty/linux/include/coin/CoinPresolveZeros.hpp b/newstructure/thirdparty/linux/include/coin/CoinPresolveZeros.hpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..219e613
--- /dev/null
+++ b/newstructure/thirdparty/linux/include/coin/CoinPresolveZeros.hpp
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+/* $Id: CoinPresolveZeros.hpp 1498 2011-11-02 15:25:35Z mjs $ */
+// Copyright (C) 2002, International Business Machines
+// Corporation and others.  All Rights Reserved.
+// This code is licensed under the terms of the Eclipse Public License (EPL).
+
+#ifndef CoinPresolveZeros_H
+#define CoinPresolveZeros_H
+
+/*! \file
+
+  Drop/reintroduce explicit zeros.
+*/
+
+#define	DROP_ZERO	8
+
+/*! \brief Tracking information for an explicit zero coefficient
+
+  \todo Why isn't this a nested class in drop_zero_coefficients_action?
+	That would match the structure of other presolve classes.
+*/
+
+struct dropped_zero {
+  int row;
+  int col;
+};
+
+/*! \brief Removal of explicit zeros
+
+  The presolve action for this class removes explicit zeros from the constraint
+  matrix. The postsolve action puts them back.
+*/
+class drop_zero_coefficients_action : public CoinPresolveAction {
+
+  const int nzeros_;
+  const dropped_zero *const zeros_;
+
+  drop_zero_coefficients_action(int nzeros,
+				const dropped_zero *zeros,
+				const CoinPresolveAction *next) :
+    CoinPresolveAction(next),
+    nzeros_(nzeros), zeros_(zeros)
+{}
+
+ public:
+  const char *name() const { return ("drop_zero_coefficients_action"); }
+
+  static const CoinPresolveAction *presolve(CoinPresolveMatrix *prob,
+					 int *checkcols,
+					 int ncheckcols,
+					 const CoinPresolveAction *next);
+
+  void postsolve(CoinPostsolveMatrix *prob) const;
+
+  virtual ~drop_zero_coefficients_action() { deleteAction(zeros_,dropped_zero*); }
+};
+
+const CoinPresolveAction *drop_zero_coefficients(CoinPresolveMatrix *prob,
+					      const CoinPresolveAction *next);
+
+#endif